Abstract:
The article summarizes theoretical ideas from several areas of knowledge in order to form a comprehensive view of the mechanisms underlying the reader’s identification with the character’s image. By the example of the prose by B.Y. Poplavsky, the constructive importance of the deictic shift in the narrator’s narrative is emphasized, which leads to the reader’s immersion in the processes of processing explicable information, loss of self-perception. Another approach focuses on the processes of constructing the author’s message: when perceiving the narrative, the reader is stimulated to use background knowledge necessary for comparison with the state of affairs described in the text at the moment. The relationship between these sequentially activated processes is conceptualized: the deictic shift and immersion in the narrative becomes the basis for the relevant interpretation of the narrative, which precedes its impact on the reader’s emotional and volitional sphere and imagination. It is concluded that the deictic shift observed in the narrative turns out to be one of the basic mechanisms of reader text processing, explication of the mental model of interpersonal relationships between characters, fixed by the narrator. The authors believe that the processes underlying the deictic shift and the mental reconstruction of the storyline together determine the reader’s sense of immersion in the literary text. The study establishes clear relationships between the linguistic originality of a literary text and various kinds of reactions of the reader perceiving this text. The reader’s going beyond his psychological and intellectual «Self», his immersion in the text provides an alternative experience that feels as if it unfolds in the format of real everyday life. It is established that changing the character’s point of view to the interlocutor character provides a relevant understanding of the narrative scenario, functions as a simulation controlled by the author in a recreated imaginary world. Fixing attention on deictic transitions in the perception of the characters’ images by the narrator entails the reader’s experiences of strong emotions similar to those experienced as a spontaneous reaction to similar situations in everyday reality.
Keywords: literary narration, reader’s identification with the image of the narrator and the main character, the space-time perspective of the narrative, deictic means, predicates of the perfect and imperfect form, the method of verbal action.
For citation:
Kudryashov IA, Turanova AYu. Reader’s Identification with the Character’s Image: Integrative Approach Mechanisms. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2023, no 3, pp. 133–144. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-3-133-144 (In Russ.).
Bionote:
*Igor A. Kudryashov1, Anastasia Yu. Turanova2
Southern Federal University; 105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str.,
Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006;
1ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5449-864Х; 2ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8612-8344;
1Web of Science Researcher ID: GPW-9308-2022;
1Scopus Author ID: 57214118052;
*e-mail: igalk@mail.ru
References:
1. Krieken van K, Hoeken H, Sanders J. Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters – A linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01190.
2. Walter N, Bilandzic H, Schwarz N., Brooks JJ. Metacognitive approach to narrative persuasion: The desirable and undesirable consequences of narrative disfluency. Media Psychology. 2020; 24 (5): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1789477.
3. Appel M, Schreiner C, Haffmans M-B, Richter T. The Mediating role of event-congruent emotions in narrative persuasion. Poetics. 2019; 77: 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101385.
4. Borovkova AA. Multiple narrator and reader: pragmatic grounds for establishing interpersonal contact. Humanities and social sciences. 2018; 3: С. 46-56. https://doi.org/10.18522/2070-1403-2018-68-3-46-56. (In Russ.).
5. Hamby A, Brinberg D, Jaccard J. A Conceptual framework of narrative persuasion. Journal of Media Psychology. Theories, Methods, and Application. 2016; 30 (3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000187.
6. Gevorkyan SS. Narrative technique of the narrator in the novel by J. Heller’s «Catch-22»: impartiality, illusion, contrast. Philology. Theory & Practice. 2022; 15, 6: 1818-1824. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220330. (In Russ.).
7. Ichino A. Narrative transportation and the power of fiction. Acme. 2019; 1: 267-282. https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-0035/13219.
8. Graaf de A, Hoeken H, Sanders J, Beentjes H. The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications. 2009; 34 (4): 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.024.
9. Fernandez-Quintanilla C. Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature. 2020; 29 (2): 124-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020927134.
10. Protasova EY. Alien speech and communication with representatives of other cultures in modern fiction. Communication studies. 2021; 8; 3: 465-480. https://doi.org/10.24147/2413-6182.2021.8(3).465-480. (In Russ.).
11. Rozin VM. Art as a form of individual creative life, artistic communication and conceptualization. Culture and art. 2022; 1: 43-56. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0625.2022.1.37303. (In Russ.).
12. Fåhraeus AWE. Fiction as a means to understanding the dynamics of empathy: A 3-year empirical study with students. Educare. 2020; (3): 46-76. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2020.3.2.
13. Maslennikova EM. Reader’s projection of the text as its interpretation: «living knowledge» and internal context. Ethnopsycholinguistics. 2022; 1(8): 35-49. https://doi.org/10.31249/epl/2022.01.03. (In Russ.).
14. Maslennikova EM. Cultural memory of text and word: (not) compatibility of author and reader. Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philology. 2022; 2 (73): 180-184. https://doi.org/10.26456/vtfilol/2022.2.180. (In Russ.).
15. Walkington Z, Ashton Wigman S, Bowles D. The impact of narratives and transportation on empathic responding. Poetics. 2020; 80: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101425.
16. Maslennikova EM. Communicative attitudes and value content of a literary text: the boundaries of (not) understanding. Ethnopsycholinguistics. 2021; 3 (6): 19-29. https://doi.org/10.31249/epl/2021.03.02. (In Russ.).
17. Kuznetsova AV. The author’s modality of the «framework» of a literary text: the pragmasemantic aspect. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2022; 4: 105-114. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-4-105-114. (In Russ.).
18. Stansfield J, Bunce L. The relationship between empathy and reading fiction: separate roles for cognitive and affective components. Journal of European Psychology Students. 2014; 5(3): 9-18. https://doi.org/ org/10.5334/jeps.ca.
19. Evsyukova TV, Gevorkyan SS. The category of negation as a means of manipulating the reader’s attention in the novel by J. Heller’s «Catch-22»: a discursive approach. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2022; 4: 94-104. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-4-94-104. (In Russ.).
20. Lazarev VA, Larina TYu. Interpretation of the novel by C. Palahniuk «Fight Club» in terms of Nietzsche’s philosophy of nihilism. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2022; 4: 193-203. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-4-193-203. (In Russ.).